Telling the Truth in Love
Here's an interesting lecture by Kim Riddlebarger on evangelism. The table comparing Man-centred and God-centred evangelism is particularly useful.
Full of meaty chunks ...
Here's an interesting lecture by Kim Riddlebarger on evangelism. The table comparing Man-centred and God-centred evangelism is particularly useful.
Jon has been complaining recently that some of his bloggy chums have not been blogging so much recently. I can only assume that since his exams are finished, he has too much time on his hands and wants to fill the long empty hours perusing edifying prose. Since he reads this space, and since my post rate has dropped catastrophically to around once per week, I can only hold my hand up to make public confession of the aforementioned failing.
Clearly I live on the wrong continent.
Following Al's recent comments here on this blog about the importance of 'narrative' and 'story', I read this comment today by Tom Wright (again), where he makes an interesting comment in a section on today's questions about Paul's theology:
The currently fashionable category of 'story' or 'narrative' has been employed as a way into [Paul's] theology, though there is currently no agreement on how to use the category, or what might happen if we did. (p. 21)In using the adjective 'fashionable', does he mean to treat the approach as a disposable garment? At best it is an approach yet to reach maturity, it seems. But then the comment was written in 1997...
The dislocation of biblical studies from theology ... has meant that Paul is often studied by people who are not trained either philosophically or theologically, and who indeed resent the idea that such training should be necessary. Many New Testament scholars use detailed exegesis as a way of escaping from heavy handed and stultifying conservatism; any attempt to articulate an overarching Pauline theology looks to them like an attempt to reconstruct the sort of system from which they themselves are glad to be free. As in some other scholarly circles, using the study of history to exorcise one's own past is an attractive, though one suspects ineffective, form of therapy.(p. 21)Ouch. He points out one of the hazards of reading other authors: trying to work out if there is a less than obvious personal agenda. Has Wright himself got one? (he asks mischievously!)
Tom Wright, speaking of Albert Schweitzer, says he
...thus carved out his own path through the first half of this century, a lonely and learned giant amidst the hordes of noisy and shallow theological pygmies.(p. 14)I wonder who he would include amongs the pygmies.
Unfortunately I have suffered a catastrophic loss of interest in this medium. Comes with being too busy. Constantly wrestling with the propensity towards self-indulgent waffle, just as this post is now becoming. Time to sign off I think...
It's been pretty mad last week.